Weaponising Minds: AI, Cyber, and Information Warfare in Cognitive Activities

As the digital dimension becomes central to modern power structures, the human mind is fast becoming the newest frontier of contemporary conflict.

This report examines how AI and cyber tools are interwoven into strategies of cognitive influence, with particular attention to the evolving political and digital landscape of South Asia.

What Is at Stake?

Cognitive warfare extends beyond traditional information operations. It reflects the weaponisation of narratives, perception, and behavioural data at scale.

Key dynamics include:

  • Algorithmic content manipulation
  • AI-driven propaganda and amplification
  • Deepfakes and synthetic media
  • State-linked and non-state disinformation campaigns
  • Real-time personalisation of influence operations

The transition from print and broadcast propaganda to digitally automated systems has enabled unprecedented precision, scale, and speed. AI systems now curate, target, and optimise narratives using behavioural data drawn from millions of users.

Objectives of the Report

  • Draw attention to emerging cognitive threats in the digital sphere
  • Examine how AI and information tools influence public cognition
  • Assess the cybersecurity and AI strategies of South Asian nations
  • Highlight the blurred boundaries between cybersecurity, information security, and cognitive warfare

Regional Focus: South Asia

The South Asia region, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, and the Maldives, presents a complex cognitive landscape shaped by:

  • Deep social, ethnic, religious, and identity divisions
  • Strong bilateral and internal tensions
  • Rapid digital adoption
  • Limited information resilience

Significant cognitive campaigns have been most visible in India and Pakistan, particularly in the context of the Kashmir conflict. Across the region, algorithmic amplification of manipulated or false content has intensified social polarisation and unrest.

These structural vulnerabilities demand both national and transnational responses.

Strategic Posture: India as a Case Study

India serves as a focused case study to assess regulatory and institutional approaches to countering cognitive threats.

01.

The term “cognitive warfare” is not formally embedded in official doctrine.

02.

Strategic thinking emphasises information warfare and psychological operations.

03.

While offensive cognitive tools are not formally acknowledged, perception-shaping remains integral to strategic posture.

This gap between terminology and practice highlights the need for clearer frameworks in addressing AI-enabled cognitive risks.

Why This Matters

Cognitive operations are not new. However, AI-driven systems have transformed their scale, automation, and precision.

Created in real time
Hyper-personalized
Automated across platforms
Optimised continuously through feedback loops

Understanding this transformation is essential to safeguarding information security, institutional stability, and democratic resilience in the region.